Balancing the Books Without Tax Increases
By Dr. Justin R. Renz


By Dr. Justin R. Renz, Associate Professor of Public Administration at the C.W. Post Campus of Long Island University. An expert on budgeting small businesses and employee motivation, Dr. Renz has studied the NIMBY Syndrome (Not In My Backyard) and can be reached through the C.W. Post Public Relations Office at (516) 299-2333.

August 1999 -- Nassau County Government is in trouble. A series of significant annual deficits during this decade has led to a staggering $300 + million deficit in 1999. This in turn has caused Wall Street, where the county government sells its debt, to vote no confidence in the Gulotta administration to solve its fiscal problems.

Wall street was right. During 1999, Nassau citizens have been led through a series of hare brained schemes to raise county revenues rather than doing what they should do - cut expenditures. Recently this culminated in the passage of the real estate transfer inequitable and damaging particularly to Nassau's senior citizens who want to sell their homes as well as to the county's long term economic development prospects.

This lack of professionalism and courage to make the right decisions in county fiscal affairs is ironic in a county that had a national reputation after World War II for fiscal integrity and stringency. This approach to good government was initially led by Republicans J. Russell Sprague and A. Holly Patterson and then Democrat Eugene Nickerson. It attracted hundreds of thousands of NYC residents who were tired of being ripped off by Tammany politicians whose only answer to fiscal problems was to tax some more and then study them to death with "blue ribbon" commission who were advisory in nature. Sound familiar?

Six months ago the Nassau Citizens Budget Committee approached the Gulotta administration with a comprehensive proposal which would have evaluated the county's overall delivery of services, fiscal and administrative management, personnel motivation, strategic planning, and general adherence to sound public administration principles. It's timetable was to come up with initial cost cutting solutions which would have told Wall Street that the county government was tackling its fiscal problems professionally and expeditiously. This was necessary before they downgraded its debt to near junk bond status. After a hearing before two county officials the Committee never heard from them again. Wall Street then subsequently downgraded their debt. Inherent in the proposal were about twenty areas where expenditures could be cut and county books balanced without tax increases. This would only occur if the Gulotta administration had the courage to advocate and implement them. Specific items included:

  • Cut county management and legislative salaries by 15% for the next 28 months until the next county administration comes into office. Why 15%? Because the county budget is likely to be at least 15% in the red during this year and county leaders should set a positive example to rectify the situation.
  • Initiate discussion with county unions to re-negotiate contracts in order to cut employee salaries by 15% at least during the next 28 months.
  • Get rid of all executive cars on a permanent basis except for uniform services administrative personnel.
  • Undertake a salary pay study which would compare Nassau's salaries with other major suburban counties throughout the country. If they were "our of line" start to change them.
  • Launch an overhead staffing study to determine if county's agencies and departments are managerially "top heavy" compared to other major suburban counties in the united States.
  • Cut out of the budget all vacant or unfilled positions.
  • Pinpoint and consolidate all fragmented, duplicative or overlapping county government services. This would also include an examination of duplicative Town government services.
  • Form an administrative committee within each county department and agency to review the need for materials and supply requests in terms of service levels.
  • Create an integrated county purchasing system which would encourage "just-in-time" inventory controls.
  • Establish incentive and motivation programs for county employees in order to achieve higher employee productivity.
  • Determine what managerial changes should be instituted to improve coordination and communication between the County Executive and county departments and agencies.
  • Identify all mandated and discretionary county services. Mandated and discretionary services would be reviewed to determine if they are absolutely necessary and why?
  • Stress efficiency and effectiveness in the delivery of county services by establishing performance and accountability standards.
  • Recruit strong pro-active professional managers for all county departments and agencies.
  • Reestablish a county wide training program for both county management and line employees to improve their productivity.
  • Develop a managerial evaluation unit attached to the County Executive Office to monitor the on-going efficiency and effectiveness of all county operations.
  • Restore professional fiscal management expenditure and revenue activities conducted by the county Budget Office.
  • Eliminate where possible the need for county rental facilities.
  • Inaugurate county government comprehensive strategic planning to establish short-term service objectives and long term county goals. This is particularly needed as the county enters the 21st century.
  • Advocate contracting out county services to the private or non-profit sectors if they can furnish them cheaper.
  • Finally review the efficacy, need for, and the cost of outside consultants in all county program operations.

Unfortunately, Nassau's fiscal problems cannot be swept under the rug by a "blue ribbon" advisory committee. They will only grow in intensity and seriousness. Perhaps it is time that County Executive Gulotta recognize that this is his last term and start to advocate and implement some significant proposals to cut county government expenditures rather than pushing poorly thought-out revenue schemes or just raising taxes. by doing so perhaps his reputations can be saved.

Back to Faculty Views